A worldwide community photographing and learning about wildlife
Syntomoides imaon
This moth is from family Arctiidae.These moths have a shape and flight (rapid wing beats so one sees a blurred cone on either side of the body, and a flight path consisting of smooth slowly evolving arcs) that is very much like that of wasps. On the Delhi University campus they are common during March and April, and a few are also seen in autumn.
Males of several palaearctic Syntomis/Amata species (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae possess an-droconial hairbrushes in connection with the foreleg coxa. The cuticular structure of these potentially behaviour-related and pheromone dissipating brushes is described. Such male-specific organs and signals play a crucial role in the female choice procedure. The presence of hairbrushes was found in 17 out of 28 inspected species of the tribe Syntomini. All members of the Syntomis phegea group (Europe to Central Asia, as well as Caspian, Caucasian and near Middle East species) have these structures, and only three oriental and south Asian, but none of three African species carry this trait. The common genetic base of this morphological character is supported by an analysis of mitochondrial 16S rRNA from 19 representative taxa; species with hairbrushes form monophyletic clade and the brushes are synapomorphic character. This genetic finding corroborates the ethological significance of these organs. Phylogenetic data show substantial genetic divergence between the tribe Ctenuchini (New World species) and the Old World Syntomini. Furthermore, DNA sequence data suggest split of the genus Amata (Sensu Obraztsov, 1966) in two distinct genera, Amata (with-out hairbrushes) and Syntomis (with hairbrushes).
Thank you so much for your kind suggestions Bayucca and Jakubo...I ll follow the method ...
Thank you, Bayucca for looking into this one. I was definitely feeling unsure about it.
Syntomis phegea or Amata phegea is a European species and not found in India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-spotte...
It is again a good example for TrekNature not being a trustable source. The ID is wrong there. Unfortunately this is also the case for this one and this page:
http://www.indianaturewatch.net/displayi...
You always have carefully read all comments and look for who is doing comments and providing an ID. If there is some comment from Peter Smetacek for example you can be sure about his ID. The same for my provided link from flickr (usually you also need to make a cross check with flickr or Picasa IDs). Mine is from John Horstman, an expert for Asian moths, so trustable: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sachingurul...
This is also trustable: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-6/synt...
Wiki is sometimes also not correct: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Syntom...
All the Amata sp. on the web need carefully double-checked, since most are not correctly ID. Here is a good example how an ID is developped on Project Noah: http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/781...
Yeah...we can see all colorful photos of these moths in google!
But i was surprised to see it in dry season here! Its hard to find green these days...
Thank u Toucan! It was amazing to find it during this season as its all dry outside!