I agree with everything you said especially your advice about going just with the genus. That is something that I should start doing (with very few exceptions) with my micro-organisms. Better to go with less info than inaccurate info.
The abdomen doesn't look so crabby, but the front four legs are pretty crabby. Land crab spiders don't seem to get the publicity that the flower crab spiders do. If it were me, I'd call it Xysticus sp. until an expert says otherwise. eol.org shows X. elegans in southwest PA, but I'd still go with just the genus.
Yikes, I wasn’t thinking in terms of crab spiders. For some reason it didn’t look very crabby until you mentioned it. In any event, X.elegans is very close but what do you think of X.speciesd?
5 Comments
I agree with everything you said especially your advice about going just with the genus. That is something that I should start doing (with very few exceptions) with my micro-organisms. Better to go with less info than inaccurate info.
Forgot to mention: you might try posting it to bugguide.net in hopes of getting a better ID.
The abdomen doesn't look so crabby, but the front four legs are pretty crabby. Land crab spiders don't seem to get the publicity that the flower crab spiders do.
If it were me, I'd call it Xysticus sp. until an expert says otherwise. eol.org shows X. elegans in southwest PA, but I'd still go with just the genus.
Yikes, I wasn’t thinking in terms of crab spiders. For some reason it didn’t look very crabby until you mentioned it. In any event, X.elegans is very close but what do you think of X.speciesd?
http://bugguide.net/node/view/300662/bgp...
Take a look at genus Xysticus, perhaps X. elegans.
http://bugguide.net/node/view/6750
http://bugguide.net/node/view/641860/bgi...