Yes, I see that also this way. As with all these Amata sp., I am not very confident with most of the Utetheisa IDs in the Australasian area if they are not coming from a trustable site/side. I would not dare to question Martins ID of Pulchelloides, but sianakdesa's is a Lotrix.
Third sight, I don't think it is Pulchella. Look at the outer margin of the forewings. In my eyes in Pulchella there should be quite a very regular row of smaller red, black and white pins/spots. In this one there is not such a regular pattern: http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lepidop/images/Ut...
13 Comments
Thanks all for the comment :)
Thank you so much for Nuwan and bayucca :)
thank you bayucca..
very confusing genus with similar looking species!
Yes, I see that also this way. As with all these Amata sp., I am not very confident with most of the Utetheisa IDs in the Australasian area if they are not coming from a trustable site/side. I would not dare to question Martins ID of Pulchelloides, but sianakdesa's is a Lotrix.
wow fantastic:)
Is so beautiful!
if pulchelloides is correct id for the spotting
http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/109...
.
what we have here might be Lotrix !!
Fourth sight: I think it is Utetheisa lotrix. Check the same criteria I mentioned below in my last comment. What would you think, Nuwan??
Third sight, I don't think it is Pulchella. Look at the outer margin of the forewings. In my eyes in Pulchella there should be quite a very regular row of smaller red, black and white pins/spots. In this one there is not such a regular pattern:
http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lepidop/images/Ut...
second sight pulchella ??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utetheisa_p...
Thanks all :)
At first sight Lotrix or Pulchelloides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utetheisa_p...
Second sight??
http://www.hkmoths.com/noc/arc/ute-lot.h...
Arctiidae, Arctiinae, Utetheisa sp.