Many thanks, wow it's been a while since I've been on here, dont see many winters critters here in Oakville, I might have a pic of the whole guy in my files. I'll check it out
These were in a line on a mossy barkless eucalyptus log over a length of about a metre. Caps were 6 to 20mm wide with a rich blue-cyan colour and slightly depressed, viscid. Height ranges from 10 to 24 mm. Stipe is white, smooth and the base is attached by a flat white disk with a blue margin (pic 4)
These were in a line on a mossy barkless eucalyptus log over a length of about a metre. Caps were 6 to 20mm wide with a rich blue-cyan colour and slightly depressed, viscid. Height ranges from 10 to 24 mm. Stipe is white, smooth and the base is attached by a flat white disk with a blue margin (pic 4)
Common name: Eastern/Bath White
Scientific name: Pontia edusa/daplidice
Wikipedia: Pontia daplidice
Unfortunately yours might also be Pontia daplidice, although the "classic" range is more the western Europe. However, classic means also that many of these two Pontia might not be correctly identified, specially if you look in older books or references. There are still conflicting results and reports about the taxonomic entity. Fact is: you cannot distinguish them by sight or 100% safe by genital dissection, only DNA. And this DNA is completely different as only DNA of different species can be. Some researchers tried to cross the two, but I didnot found some reports in public libraries. Daplidice is found is Western and Central Europe, Croatia is central Europe (Switzerland should be Middle Europe), to Eastern Asia. Both are migrating butterflies, although Daplidice less than Edusa. There is even a so called "Bastardgürtel", sorry for the German expression, but I do not know an english word for that and I do not know the exact location/range of this "hybrid belt".
Personally I would also tend to Edusa, but with the knowledge of all the troubles, I suggest that you take Pontia edusa/daplidice as scientific name. I think that is a valuable compromise. What do you think?
Mapping Nature on Your Smartphone
For the developers at New York start-up Networked Organisms, smartphones are the butterfly nets of the 21st Century. Their tool, Project Noah, lets people upload photos of plants and wildlife around them, creating a map of the natural world and contributing to scientific research in the process.
What kind of beetle? This app knows
Bespectacled scientists of yore would carry around hefty field guides, made up of hundreds of pages of text and photos. But these days, smartphone owners have a lighter option: an app called Project Noah, which aims to help people identify plants and animals as well as collect data from "citizen scientists" about where certain species are located.
Designing ecosystems for talent development
Project Noah enables us to be part of a more focused online community where we can learn more about wildlife around us and contribute to scientific research. It pulls participants into deeper, more meaningful engagement by enabling people to go on “missions” to collectively map changes based on sightings.
A smart way to save wildlife
A modern invention that may also hold the key to saving species in the future. Project Noah is a global study that encourages nature lovers to document the wildlife they encounter, using a purpose built phone app and web community. In addition to the virtual "collection" of species, Project Noah encourages citizen science by linking up with existing surveys including the International Spider Survey and the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network.
Dial-a-Class
New mobile applications include a tool called NOAH that lets you take cellphone pictures of bugs and trees and then sends back an identification of the exact type in as little as 24 hours.
